Dr. Green – New Evidence – episode 2

Written by Mark Steinhouser on December 19th, 2011

Dr Green- New Evidence – Producer: Don Groner
Video Rating: 3 / 5

Responses to the video summarized and then we move on to some analytical thoughts and observations.
Video Rating: 3 / 5

Tags: , ,

19 Responses to “Dr. Green – New Evidence – episode 2”

  1. BFResearchSE Says:

    @TheSAYEN1 Thanks Susan. LOL You’re toooo kind. Hope you have a great weekend.

  2. TheSAYEN1 Says:

    Good to see you Alex!  (no Herman Munster here) Whew! is it hot in here? :)

  3. BFResearchSE Says:

    @steverid Thanks for watching Steve and Very funny (curtain). I appreciate the nice complement and glad you liked it.

  4. steverid Says:

    Howdy Alex, it is great to finally put a face with the voice. I’m glad you finally made the choice to come out of the closet………OH JEESH!!! That’s not what I meant…….I mean like from behind the curtain……like the Wizard of Oz! Anyway, great series of vids & thank you for your heartfelt opinions. You do great research.

    Take care,

    Stevesquatch

  5. markz800 Says:

    hey alex i’m glad to see your face man i think i’m in love haha.

  6. froggydale Says:

    Alex I can only say this man. you got my respect for saying this about your findings and sticking your neck out like this because many wont go to this style of research or state they’re facts and present them as you are. i will have questions of course and may dissagree on some ponits but know this, it will be in a respectful way man,
    great video series,
    frog

  7. HucksterFoot Says:

    @georgiabigfootteam That’s the thing, there really isn’t enough hard data to determine the genetics of Bigfoot. But in the end, if there is a conclusion to all this. I feel it (Sasquatch) may fall in the same family (Hominidae) as we humans share with the chimps, gorillas and orangutans. A bipedal primate for sure, if it’s anything : ) Being bipedal and having attributed intelligent behaviors, certainly cannot determine how close they might be genetically to us, or to any other large primate.

  8. BFResearchSE Says:

    @cprahl007 Ron Morehead and Al Berry have always (since 2005) been kind of a heroes for me. The guy is a class act and he has class act people around him (e.g. Scott Nelson). Those audios are incredible and the verbal interactions will be tough for anyone to duplicate. Anyway, never want to take away from Ron. Adam’s (websquatch com) brief audio snippets are not comparable in time but the info they convey is compelling. Thanks to Pat Rance I got to be a part of a very cool event.

  9. cprahl007 Says:

    @BFResearchSE Yea Right ! lol

  10. BFResearchSE Says:

    @cprahl007 Thanks Chuck. And you forgot zapping you. Come on down man. They have their ray guns charged for you. I told them what you said.  Kidding. )

  11. BFResearchSE Says:

    @redchun Advance and trust. If they take you’re head off, I was wrong. I’ll make sure to do a video RIP for you. Kidding man. As you know with that tree breaking account that you had, they control the tempo and won’t rip you to pieces. You’ve had quite a few encounters yourself. If there’s a rogue and he wants to get you, you’d have no chance in those woods either way…kind of a wrong place wrong time deal.

  12. BFResearchSE Says:

    @joe2trees Thanks Ron. I really appreciate that. I thought that I might get crucified on this less than scientific video message. Take care.

  13. cprahl007 Says:

    I think it’s only prudent to not put a lot of stock in any one set of evidence that cannot be duplicated. I may be wrong about this but I don’t think the Sierra sounds have been duplicated elsewhere but I could easily be inaccurate about that. I look forward to seeing and hearing your work over the next couple days and thanks for sharing this heart felt account of your experiences.

  14. cprahl007 Says:

    Hey it’s great to finally see you in the light of day, I had a misperception that you were from an Alien planet, thanks for clearing that up ! LOL You made some great points and like you said it’s all how we over the last couple hundred years have percieved these hairy giants of the forests. And many accounts are at night or the dark woods and humans are taught to fear what we don’t know. Especially giant strong hairy things that growl, scream bloody murder and use sapplings for tooth picks

  15. redchun Says:

    @redchun Should we trust them or should we fear them?Do we advance towards them or give them their space?How do we know if they are all mentally stable?Hell,I don`t even trust my own kind.I think you can go on and on with this subject.I can understand why some call them creatures or beasts,there are similarities on both sides.

  16. redchun Says:

    Great series of videos Alex! Nice to see you again! I think this subject in all honesty can go either way.After talking to you for more than a year now,I have changed alot in my beliefs.I was looking for a monster animal type creature but I believe they are more human like.But you can see other points like walking on all fours,eating raw meat,growling,beating the chest like an ape,living in caves or weeds or trees,etc.I just don`t think we know enough about them to say what they are.

  17. joe2trees Says:

    All those involved in field research must tailor thier methods towards trust and respect of WHO these beings are and not as we think they are. There were native americans who flat out refused contact with europeans because of what they saw as a threat to thier way of life. Not all were warriors. Most hid or thru stealth lived in close proximity with the white man. If something worked it wasnt changed but refined.

  18. joe2trees Says:

    Thank you Alex for this 3 part series. You really got the crux of the message out. Everything you said is the antithises of my own conclusions based on my own research. I reiterate that I dont have ANY first hand experience but after reading mountains of legitimate eye witness research and testimonies one can see clearly a thread running thru that gives creedence to everything you just said.

  19. georgiabigfootteam Says:

    Although there is a huge amount of variation in external morphology of the human animal, if a caucasian male of Germanic descent breeds with an Australian aboriginee female, the offspring will still have an intermembral index of 71, the chin will be above the acromioclavicular joint, and the foot will not have a hinged joint in the middle. It is our genome that defines us as “human”. Again, as I have said before, the Sasquatch are definitely sentient, just not human. (IMO)

Leave a Reply