First Moon Landing 1969
Written by Mark Steinhouser on December 2nd, 2011
The video of the very first moon landing of the apollo 11 mission in 1969! Neil Armstrong was the first man to set foot on the moon with his now legenday words “One small step for man, a giant leap for mankind.” This is a truly amazing video and it was in 1969!!! If you think about it, you have orders of magnitude more processing power in your mobile phone than they did in the whole space craft!! Incredible!
December 2nd, 2011 at 3:23 am
APOLLO DISNEY SCIENCE
December 2nd, 2011 at 3:44 am
@YDDES THE MORON
Every astronaut in space history has seen stars in space because the sky is black.
Lol this retard posts about standing under a street lamp
Phil Plaits special morons trolling youtube
December 2nd, 2011 at 4:22 am
@CNN911Fakes Not seeing stars near brightly illuminated objects on Earth has NOTHING to do with reflection of light in the atmosphere. Standing under a streetlamp You’ll see no stars. Go just a few feet away and turn Your back to the lamp. You will see the stars if there is no other bright lightsource in Your field of view. Nothing to do with reflections or air pollutions. Only with the iris in Your eye.
December 2nd, 2011 at 4:50 am
@YDDES
Armstrong said the sky is deep black in space.
Where is the VERY bright sunlight you moron trolling youtube?
December 2nd, 2011 at 5:48 am
@CNN911Fakes Why don’t try to be serious, just for a little time? The astronauts eyes (and the cameras) adopted to the VERY brightly illuminated surface. The stars were VERY much too faint compared to that surface to be seen or registered on the film. In those stiff spacesuits and helmets with restricted vision, the astronauts would have had to lay down on their backs to have only the sky and nothing of the ground in their field of view.
December 2nd, 2011 at 6:42 am
APOLLO DISNEY SCIENCE
THATS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE
December 2nd, 2011 at 7:01 am
@Monkeyboysdontknow (contd)
So, what you’re saying is, if after sunrise, I only look upward, away from bright things, I will see stars. Cool. That is true.
Of course, the naughts were so busy bouncing around on their wires, they didn’t think to look up at the most magnificent display of God’s wonder available to any man. They had work to do.
Bouncy, bouncy, bouncy. Gosh sound like a laundry advert.
December 2nd, 2011 at 7:40 am
@Monkeyboysdontknow No problem. The light from my house as well as the light pollution surrounding my house reflect off the atmosphere and the persisten contrail pollution. I can’t see naught but a few planets on the best of nights – all thanks to NASA
Of course, there is neither persistent contrail polution nor atmosphere on the moon to reflect ambient light
I really do wonder why you shills insist on using earthbound examples to try to prove the NASA lie about the moon. Air makes a diff
December 2nd, 2011 at 8:32 am
@CNN911Fakes
‘Around sunrise, when do the stars disappear and why?’
When the surrounding light causes the iris to contract, because the human eye adapts to the amount of light it is subject to. Now, answer THIS question. When you are inside your house on a clear night with the lights on, how many stars do you see outside your window? I seriously doubt you will answer this honestly.
December 2nd, 2011 at 8:47 am
@krisdevalle, the guy who kibbitzed with his fellow shill
‘Now I am just thinking of the cartoons where the sun goes ‘BADOING’ into the sky.
This guy is just the best fun’
can’t figure out how discussing the fact that stars are visible all of the time from space and the moon is relevent to the apollo faked moon program.
C’mon shill, at sunrise on the moon, at what point do the straight up stars disappear and why?
December 2nd, 2011 at 9:14 am
van halen belt has areas around earth that isnt covered by the belt. its safe and free of the small radiation. wow so they went to the moon and those skeptices still wont shut up
December 2nd, 2011 at 10:09 am
Uhhhhh the moon isit made of cheese my dreams smashed! I was going to eat the whole thing and not share it not with anyone!
December 2nd, 2011 at 10:46 am
@CNN911Fakes If you could phrase your question in regards to the Apollo manned lunar programs.
Just you know, how it relates. Because right now, your question is irrelevant. Explain the relevance and perhaps we can continue.
December 2nd, 2011 at 11:26 am
@krisdevalle You are so confident, yet unable to answer the simple question;
Around sunrise, when do the stars disappear and why?
We have all agreed that they are there when it is night on the moon. YOu say they are gone during daylight. So, tell us how transition occurs and when.
Again, naked eyes, looking straight up.
December 2nd, 2011 at 12:08 pm
@nameofthepen That’s what we are trying to establish. Fakes is mired in technicalities and lacks any clear point.
I believe this stems from astronauts stating they could not see stars from the lunar surface, a statement that can be verified from corresponding lunar photography, or even simple photographs taken of the moon from orbit, or Earth.
December 2nd, 2011 at 1:05 pm
@CNN911Fakes But how does this relate to the Apollo moon landings?
December 2nd, 2011 at 1:36 pm
@GeneralSamov – Yes, but…does it say “The *completed* rise…”? No, “sunrise” means just that: the action of rising. Technically, the first peep over the horizon = “sunrise”. In English, anyway.
I don’t understand the other stuff you guys are saying. If any sunbeams at all are hitting something on the moon, they’re gonna burn that spot just as hard whether the sun is fully up, or still rising, right? It has to do with atmosphere vs. no atmosphere, yes?
December 2nd, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Everytime I hear “One small step for man,One giant leap from mankind” I think of So Random when Chad is on the moon.
December 2nd, 2011 at 2:59 pm
The ESL shill @GeneralSamov said
“the Sun shines with the same intensity whether it’s all risen above the horizon or it’s still half hidden” is not true
Well, let’s examine that little absurdity.
Ignoring sunspots, Given a fixed distance from the sun, does the intensity of the sun’s radiation vary at all depending on where you are on the circumfernce of the circle formed by the radius of that distance?
The correct answer, BTW, is “no it doesn’t” The intensity varies only on distance.
December 2nd, 2011 at 3:31 pm
@CNN911Fakes But why?
How does relate to the Apollo program?
December 2nd, 2011 at 3:42 pm
@CNN911Fakes
Why I’d never deny the newcomers a chance for a good, honest laugh that makes you hold your belly with your hands.
December 2nd, 2011 at 4:09 pm
@nameofthepen
I also found
- the rise or ascent of the sun above the horizon in the morning.
But anyway, not that this matters too much, when you accompany that with an unheard amount of absurdities. For example, that the Sun shines with the same intensity whether it’s all risen above the horizon or it’s still half hidden, or that such intensity on Earth gradually increases until it hits its maximum at noon and then starts decreasing back.
December 2nd, 2011 at 4:28 pm
@krisdevalle
Yeah, I can’t blame him, taking a look outside on a clear night and seeing those myriads of stars must be pretty overwhelming for a rather virgin mind. Top that with an ego as big as the ignorance and you’re in for some serious headaches and a lot of tears (mostly due to the unhealthy amounts of ensuing laughter).
December 2nd, 2011 at 4:59 pm
Like I said, you guys would now spread your excrement across the front page to try to keep people from seeing your comments about the stars and sunset/sunrise on the moon.
There is no inductive argument you can win, that is why you resort to your disinfo tactics.
Feel free to answer the question about how fast the stars disappear from view on the moon at sunrise
and why.
December 2nd, 2011 at 5:02 pm
@GeneralSamov – Sorry, General, but CNN911Fakes wins this round. Definition of “Sunrise” (in English):
▸ noun: the daily event of the sun rising above the horizon
▸ noun: the first appearance of the sun above the horizon in the morning
▸ noun: atmospheric phenomena accompanying the daily appearance of the sun
▸ noun: the first light of day
See? You cannot pretend the event will manifest on the moon as it does on the earth. Therefore, C9F is correct.